• Luli Faber

The Energy That Heals: Biophoton Emissions and The Body of Light


By David Muehsam, PhD | April 22, 2018

Reproduced from: www.chi.is/energy-heals-part-ii-biophoton-emissions-body-light

A few weeks ago, we looked at a Brief History of Healing and Regeneration with Electric and Magnetic Fields, Part I. We saw that the use of electric currents and magnetic fields for healing dates back to ancient times, and that the information-based viewpoint emerging in modern bioelectromagnetics has striking parallels with Tibetan, Jain and Vedic medical traditions, where concepts of energy and information are fundamental in health and healing.

Here, we’ll take a look at a fascinating aspect of bioelectromagnetics: biophoton emissions, which are the spectrum of light emitted naturally by all living things. Much weaker than the bioluminescence found in fireflies and many marine animals, biophoton emissions occur over a very broad range of frequencies, spanning the infrared, visible and ultraviolet ranges (refs 1,2). These “ultra weak” biophoton emissions are too faint to see with the naked eye, even in complete darkness, but can be detected with modern equipment and have been increasingly studied in recent years (ref 2).

Ultra weak biophoton emissions, most commonly produced during oxidative metabolic or stress processes in the body, have been suggested as non-invasive low cost diagnostic and testing methods in agriculture, food chemistry and biomedicine (ref 2). This ‘body of light’ has been shown to reflect a variety of different states of health and disease, and for example, Fritz-Albert Popp observed in 2009 that as living cells become more crowded in a cell culture dish, cancer cells exhibit increased biophoton emissions, while normal cells do not (ref 3). A systematic review from John Ives and colleagues on the diagnostic use of biophotons concluded that the peer reviewed literature is “surprisingly large,” with the majority of studies of “good to high” quality (ref 4). The authors recommended that randomized controlled clinical trials should be performed to determine if biophoton techniques could be used for non-invasively evaluating the specific inflammatory state of the individual and providing a general measure of overall health (ref 4).

A growing body of research suggests that ultra-weak biophoton emissions can also play roles in how cells and tissues in the body grow, repair and divide. The first report in 1923 of ultraviolet (UV) light emission during cell division in onion roots was from Alexander Gurwitsch (ref 5), who subsequently found that UV light could stimulate cell division, and posited the existence of “mitogenic rays” governing basic processes of growth and repair (ref 6). The early observations of Gurwitsch were further developed in the 1980’s and 1990’s by Fritz-Albert Popp and L.V. Beloussov, who elucidated many of the basic properties of ultra weak biophoton emissions (refs 6,7). Since that time, biophotons have been reported to be involved in a variety of biological functions (ref 8), including secretion of regulatory neurotransmitters (ref 9), respiratory activity in white blood cells (ref 10), seed germination (ref 11), yeast growth (refs 12,13), algae growth (ref 14), and interactions between fish eggs and embryos (ref 15).

While it may not be surprising that biophoton emissions reflect biochemical activity, there is increasing evidence that light itself plays a role in how the cells in our bodies communicate with one another (ref 16). Two seminal studies from Gunther Albrecht-Buehler in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA (refs 17,18) reported long-range interactions between cells due to infrared light, concluding that “The results suggest that near-infrared light scattering by the cells mediate a long-range attraction between them, which does not require physical contact and enables them to detect each other’s presence.” (ref 18)

And a remarkable study by Daniel Fels in 2009 reported that cells can influence one another using non-molecular signals, most probably photons (ref 19). Fels looked at interactions between two groups of single-celled organisms (paramecium caudatum) chemically isolated from each other in clear containers. In a series of experiments, Fels reported that information regulating cell division and energy uptake passed through a quartz window between the cells, but was blocked by one made of glass. Since quartz easily transmits UV light, whereas glass does not, Fels suggested that the long-range effect was mediated by photons in the UV range. Since 2009, Fels has continued with this research, in 2016 reporting interactions between two different species of microorganisms, Paramecium caudatum, and Euglena viridis (refs 20,21). Fels also conducted experiments in which the groups of microorganisms were shielded from each other against electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in the optical spectrum. He found that some effects were blocked by EMF shielding, suggesting that an electromagnetic interaction was involved.

These modern observations of ultra-weak biophoton emissions are reminiscent of ancient concepts where the gross physical body and mind are connected through a ‘body of light,’ an intermediate subtle body that is described in energetic terms (ref 22). For example, the Jain concept of the kärman sarir, describes a subtle body that surrounds the soul, interacting with consciousness emanating from the soul (Figure 1). Jain teachings describe the interaction of the soul’s consciousness with the karmic field, producing emanations termed adhyavasāya. Adhyavasāya are described as 2 types: psychical and physiological.

These adhyavasāya are thought to be energetic in nature and are described in a manner that bears strong resemblance to modern descriptions of electromagnetic fields (ref 22).

Ancient viewpoints such as these are reflected in an emerging biofield paradigm describing a complex dynamic informational field essential to all life (ref 23). This shift from a purely mechanical, chemistry-based viewpoint to an information-based view is reflected in advances in closely-related fields that once seemed disconnected: biophysics, biology, psychology, and the developing fields of mind-body research such as psychoneuroimmunology and psychosocial genomics (ref 23). These results have helped substantially to form a foundation for an expanded integrative medical model and hold promise for a better understanding of health, healing and a better science of life (ref 23).

Figure 1. Simplistic description of Jain theories regarding the relationship between the embodied soul (jiva), consciousness (citta), and the interaction of consciousness with the subtle bodies (karma body, tejas body, physical body): Jains describe the rays of consciousness from the soul as interacting with the karma body to give rise to subtle vibrations (adhyvasaya) that influence the makeup and dynamics of the fiery (tejas) body and thus impact physical and emotional functioning. The interaction of adhyvasaya with the fiery body also gives rise to organized biofields of information that relay one’s psychospiritual state (lesya). Image source: http://www.jainworld.com/jainbooks/karma/ch8.aspu

References

  1. Cifra M, Fields JZ, Farhadi A. Electromagnetic cellular interactions. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2011 May;105(3):223-46.

  2. Cifra M, Pospíšil P. Ultra-weak photon emission from biological samples: definition, mechanisms, properties, detection and applications. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2014 Oct 5;139:2-10.

  3. Popp FA. Cancer growth and its inhibition in terms of coherence. Electromagn Biol Med. 2009;28(1):53-60.

  4. Ives JA, van Wijk EP, Bat N, Crawford C, Walter A, Jonas WB, van Wijk R, van der Greef J. Ultraweak photon emission as a non-invasive health assessment: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e87401.

  5. Gurwitsch A. Die Natur des spezifischen Erregers der Zellteilung. Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen. 1923;52:11–40.

  6. Beloussov LV, Opitz JM, Gilbert SF. Life of Alexander G. Gurwitsch and his relevant contribution to the theory of morphogenetic fields. Int J Dev Biol. 1997 Dec;41(6):771–7.

  7. Popp FA, Li KH, Gu Q. (eds). 1992. Recent advances In biophoton research and its applications. World Scientific. Singapore, New York, London, Hong Kong.

  8. Popp F A, Chang JJ. The physical background and the informational character of biophoton emission. In Chang, J.J., Fish, J., & Popp, F.A. (Eds.), Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Biophotons. 1998. (pp.238–250).

  9. Galantsev VP, Kovalenko SG, Moltchanov AA, Prutskov VI. Lipid peroxidation, low-level chemiluminescence and regulation of secretion in the mammary gland. Experientia. 1993 Oct 15;49(10):870–5.

  10. Shen X, Bei L, Hu TH, Aryal B. The possible role played by biophotons in the long-range interaction between neutrophil leukocytes. In Beloussov, L., Popp, F.A., Voeikov, V., & VanWijk, R. (Eds.), Biophotonics and Coherent Systems. Moscow: Moscow University Press. 2000. (pp.336–346).

  11. Kuzin AM, Surbenova GN. Secondary biogenic irradiation of plant structures after gamma-irradiation at low dose. In Beloussov, L.V., & Popp, F.A. (Eds.), Biophotonics. Moscow: Bioinform Services. 1995 (pp.257–265).

  12. Quickenden TI, Que Hee SS (1976) The spectral distribution of the luminescence emitted during growth of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its relationship to mitogenetic radiation. Photochemistry and Photobiology 23: 201–204.

  13. Musumeci F, Scordino A, Triglia A, Blandino G, Milazzo I Intercellular communication during yeast cell growth. Europhysics Letters. 1999;47: 736–742.

  14. Jaffe LF (2005) Marine plants may polarize remote Fucus eggs via luminescence. Luminescence 20: 414–418.

  15. Beloussov LV, Burlakov AB, Louchinskaia NN. Biophotonic patterns of optical interactions between fish eggs and embryos. Indian J Exp Biol. 2003 May;41(5):424-30.

  16. Vanwijk R. Bio-photons and Bio-communication. Journal of Scientific Exploration. 2001;15(2): 183–197.

  17. Albrecht-Buehler G. Rudimentary form of cellular vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 1992; (89):8288–8292.

  18. Albrecht-Buehler G. A long-range attraction between aggregating 3T3 cells mediated by near-infrared light scattering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 5;102(14):5050-5.

  19. Fels D. Cellular communication through light. PLoS One. 2009;4(4):e5086.

  20. Fels D. Physical Non-Contact Communication between Microscopic Aquatic Species: Novel Experimental Evidences for an Interspecies Information Exchange. J Biophys. 2016; 2016: 7406356.

  21. Fels D. Endogenous physical regulation of population density in the freshwater protozoan Paramecium caudatum. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 13800.

  22. Jain S, Daubenmier J, Muehsam D, Rapgay L, Chopra D. Indo-Tibetan Philosophical and Medical Systems: Perspectives on the Biofield. Glob Adv Health Med. 2015 Nov;4(Suppl):16-24.

  23. Rubik B, Muehsam D, Hammerschlag R, Jain S. Biofield Science and Healing: History, Terminology, and Concepts. Glob Adv Health Med. 2015 Nov;4(Suppl):8-14.

#biophotons #cancer #cellbiology